In a follow-up grid question (called Q8), respondents are asked questions about the place that they selected in Q7b. I would like to pipe in the text-only Internal Label from Q7List into the question text.

What would be the best way to do this in Lighthouse Studio 9.17.2?

I have problem about randomization. I have 11 row attributes and 5 likert-scale.

The sixth attribute (Center) is a trick question. I have to randomize all of the attributes but the sixth attribute must be the fixed on center (Sixth position in row).

Waiting your suggestions, 🙂

Best Regards,

If there is a survey after the respondents finished the survey and they are completed records, but I want to add some questions to the link.

How can they open it again?

While debugging, I noticed that the internal reset code seems to look for an element like:

```js
choices_r1_graphical
```

but that element does not seem to exist in the generated 9.17 DOM:

Could you confirm whether the DOM structure for graphical radio buttons changed in 9.17, and whether `SSI_RadioReset("choices_r1")` is still supported for grid rows?

Is there a recommended replacement or workaround?

Thanks,
Jens

My questions:

1. The estimates in the Export Report summary file for a given solution are from the “best replication.” Are the individual-level values exported from the Data Management window also from the best replication?

2. If the individual-level values are from the best replication, should I be able to get the same summary values for each utility and standard error by summarizing in a different application? If not, why not?

3. How do I calculate the standard errors and t-ratios from either the individual-level raw utility or rescaled utility values exported from the Data Management window? I have seen other posts that mention the standard definition of standard error (standard deviation/square root of sample size) and an alternative calculation (square root of variance). Is there other output I need to be using? If so, how do I get it?

4. Are the t-ratios calculated using the raw utility estimates equivalent to t-ratios that would be calculated using rescaled utility estimates? Because the rescaled utilities may be dispersed differently around zero than raw utilities, I didn't want to assume that the statistical tests would be the same for both sets of utilities.

5. As a point of clarification, in Chapter 12 of "Becoming an Expert in Conjoint Analysis," the text refers to coefficients and part-worth utilities, but the Exhibits use the word "Effect." Are these terms all synonymous? In the output from Sawtooth, when is something called or interpreted as a "coefficient," an "effect," and/or as a "part-worth utility"?

 FWIW, I’m running Lighthouse Studio 9.16.16. Thanks in advance for your help!

How can I create a question that allow respondent can sign on it during interview? Please check my attach.

If not, do you have any way?

Any programmers, freelance or otherwise, who might be in a position to help out for a fee? We're on a budget but can hopefully work something out that's a win-win.

Thank you,
Alan

Data collection will be done via telephone interviews, which limits the number of items per task. Therefore, we want to keep the design to 3 items per screen. 17 items per respondent may be too many, so we are considering showing each respondent only a random subset of 12 items.

We are considering implementing this using Express MaxDiff  where not all items are shown to each respondent.

My questions are:

• Is Express MaxDiff an appropriate approach in this case, even though it is typically used for larger item sets (e.g., >40 items)?

• With this setup, can we still obtain respondent-level output?