Hello,
we conducted an ACBC Analysis for a university project. While sorting the data we found differences between the counts of unacceptable and must have data.
While the analysis tool of Sawtooth shows us 7 respondents who chose a certain level as unacceptable we count only 4 when manually counting the answers. Is this a result of missing attributes (attributes that didn't appear in the questionnaire) being marked as unacceptables or/and a result of marked must haves that automatically marked all other levels as unacceptables?
But more importantly: We manually count many more marked must haves than the analysis counting tool shows us. Where could that come from?
Thank you very much in advance and all the best!
ACBC MustHave/Unacceptable Differences Between Analysis Counts and Manual Counts
Resolved
2 replies